Carbon dating and the bible
Such is the case with the other methods that yield the long time chronologies frequently published in the popular press.But with the longer chronologies the problems are compound by many orders of magnitude. If you follow the sources I gave you, you will have enough information to keep you busy for while on this interesting topic.After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings.Carbon-14 is considered to be a highly reliable dating technique.You can find information on carbon dating from most of these sources.The gist of this issue of dating is that a number of assumptions have to be made to get a date, many of which can be dramatically wrong.Assumptions like: how much was there to begin with, no parent carbon 14 or daughter carbon 12 leaked in or out, and the decay rate has been constant.The first two are wild guesses, and even the third can be challenged.
Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some can tolerate.I am doing research for a paper I am writing for Sociology. Do you know of any good websites, books, magazines or anything that could help my case out for Creation? This is a very comprehensive list of the premiere sources for creation science information.I also make purchase recommendations for the most impactful videos and books available from these sources there.Her report in 2009 confirmed the presence of collagen and other proteins that bacteria do not make.In 2011, a Swedish team found soft tissue and biomolecules in the bones of another creature from the time of the dinosaurs, a Mosasaur, which was a giant lizard that swam in shallow ocean waters.
Carbon 14 decays to Carbon 12 with an "average" half life of 5730 years.